The Jan. 25 service at Tabernacle Baptist Church in Cartersville (see video above) featured a sermon by Cochran that he called “the blessings of sufferings.” He described the difference between what he called “self-inflicted sufferings” and “God-induced sufferings,” calling his firing a “God-induced suffering.”
“That’s what this experience is for me and my family,” he said. “This is not as a result of something that I didn’t do that God is chastening me for, this is something that God has chosen to do because of his purpose and design for not just me and my family but for a greater cause for the kingdom of God.”
Cochran then went on to claim that God told him he was in the same company as Job, Jesus Christ and others.
“God reminded me that I’m in pretty good company when it comes to God-induced sufferings. He reminded me, brothers and sisters, that Job was just minding his own business, being a faithful husband, taking good care of his children, minding his flocks in his fields and god volunteered him for an unimaginable God-induced suffering. But after he endured the suffering, God blessed him with twice as much as all that he had prior to the suffering.”
Cochran then compared himself to Daniel in the story of him and King Darius, and how others plotted against Daniel to bring him down, making a comparison between the 30 days that King Darius made Daniel pray to only him and the 30-day suspension Mayor Reed gave Cochran. The plotters against Daniel were thrown to the lions, Cochran says.
“[Daniel] was so faithful and so successful, the King was thinking about putting him over the whole territory. The other two presidents and some princes put up a plot against Daniel and they said, ‘The only way we’re going to get Daniel in trouble because he’s so efficient, is through his faith.’ So they made the King sign a decree that nobody could pray to anybody but the king for guess how long? 30 days. Daniel says, ‘As faithful as I am to you oh King, I’m going to sustain my prayer life,’ and he kept right on going. His friends caught him praying, he ended up in the lion’s den, the punishment for praying to anybody besides the King. The King was brokenhearted. He loved Daniel, he prayed and fasted all night and ran to the lion’s den the next morning and realized that Daniel’s God had saved him from the lions. He made a decree that nobody could worship any other God in this kingdom but Daniel’s God and threw the plotters, the schemers against Daniel and their families, in the lion’s den and they became food for the lions.”
Cochran made the final comparison, saying, “Then he reminded me of the ultimate suffering servant, Jesus Christ, who suffered, bled and died. Rose again on the third day and because of his suffering he has the name that is above every name. God blesses always during suffering.”
Cochran also dove into the book controversy and said that sex should only be had for procreation and that it should only be between a man and a woman—a point met with a round of applause by those in attendance.
“So where did the trouble come from? Well you can’t have a book talking about men overcoming condemnation unless you talk about sex because it’s a challenge for many of us. And you can’t talk about sex unless you talk about it in the context of the creation, why God made it. And he made sex for procreation. ‘Be fruitful and multiply.’ And you can’t be fruitful and multiply unless you have a man and a woman.”
He ended his sermon by predicting his full vindication, whatever that may entail.
“I found out there are worldly consequences for standing for righteousness, but what God is about to show everybody is that there are also kingdom consequences for standing for righteousness. And he’s going to vindicate me in such a way that everybody will see it and everybody will know that it’s nobody but the most high God who is vindicating me.”
The end credits then ran over an image of Cochran’s book, “Who Told You That You Were Naked?”
Virginia Galloway, regional director of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, made such a point in a recent interview with the GA Voice, saying, “The Religious Freedom and Restoration Act would not help him from a legal standpoint. His situation is an employee and employer situation which would be covered by federal law. The RFRA would not have any bearing on his situation one way or another.”